In Defense of ‘Sex and the City,’ ‘Jane the Virgin,’ Beyoncé, and Dorothy Parker

cq5dam.web.1200.675I go back to Emily Nussbaum’s perfect 2013 defense of Sex and the City in The New Yorker over and over again. But I particularly go back to this one part, so many times, and it’s always to defend some of my favorite shows, and even other pop cultural works. Not just Sex and the City, but also Jane the Virgin, or Crazy Ex-Girlfriend, or Nora Ephron movies, or Beyoncé’s last two albums, or Dorothy Parker’s oeuvre.

Here it is:

“So why is the show so often portrayed as a set of empty, static cartoons, an embarrassment to womankind? It’s a classic misunderstanding, I think, stemming from an unexamined hierarchy: the assumption that anything stylized (or formulaic, or pleasurable, or funny, or feminine, or explicit about sex rather than about violence, or made collaboratively) must be inferior.”

Use it as you see fit, too.

Subscribe to my monthly newsletter here.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s